Getting humans to do quantum optimization - user acquisition, engagement and early results from the citizen cyberscience game Quantum Moves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v1i2.11Keywords:
game, citizen science, computer algorithmsAbstract
The game Quantum Moves was designed to pit human players against computer algorithms, combining their solutions into hybrid optimization, to control a scalable quantum computer. In this midstream report, we open our design process and present the constitutive building stages. We present our approach starting with designing a core gameplay around quantum simulations, to putting extra game elements in place to frame, structure and motivate players’ difficult path from internet flâneur to competent science contributors. Among statistical predictors for retention and in-game high scores, the data from our first year suggest that people recruited based on real-world physics interest and via real-world events, but only with an intermediate science education, are more likely to become engaged and skilled contributors. We discuss this relationship between in-world and in-game factors on intrinsic and intrinsic motivation, and its implications for using real live humans to do hybrid optimization via initially simple, but very cognitively complex games.References
Antin, J., & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, 7 -12 May 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180–191.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.
Bob, P. (2009). Chaos, cognition and the disordered brain. ANS: The Journal for Neurocognitive Research, 50, 114–117. Retrieved from http://w.activitas.org/index.php/nervosa/article/viewArticle/14
Bowser, A., Preece, J., & Hansen, D. (2013). Gamifying Citizen Science : Lessons and Future Directions. In CHI’13, April 27 – May 2, 2013, Paris, France.
Brasiliero, F. V. (2014). Volunteers engagement profiles in volunteer thinking systems. In Presentation at Citzen Cyberscience Summit 2014, 20-22. February 2014. London, UK.
Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(March), 25. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025
Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books).
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–68; discussion 692–700. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10589297
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie …, 49(3), 182–185. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/cap/49/3/182/
Edelman, G. M., & Tonini, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness. New York: Basic. London: Penguin. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:A+universe+of+consciousness#4
Elias, G. S., Garfield, R. S., & Gutschera, K. R. (2012). Characteristics of Games. Cambridge MA: Mit Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.dk/books?id=Vg_NygAACAAJ
Fields, T. (2014). Mobile & Social Game Design: Monetization Methods and Mechanics (2nd ed.). Boca Ranton, FL: CRC press - Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://books.google.dk/books?id=DZSlAgAAQBAJ
Friston, K. (2012). Predictive coding, precision and synchrony. Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.691277
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–53. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
Heeter, C., Lee, Y., Medler, B., & Magerko, B. (2011). Beyond player types: gaming achievement goal. In … Symposium on Video Games (pp. 43–48). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2018565
Iacovides, I., Aczel, J., Scanlon, E., & Woods, W. (2011). What can breakdowns and breakthroughs tell us about learning and involvement experienced during game-play? In 5th European Conference on Games Based Learning, 20-21 October 2011. Athens, Greece. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/29904/
Iacovides, I., Aczel, J., Scanlon, E., & Woods, W. (2013). Making Sense of Game-Play : How Can We Examine Learning and Involvement ? Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1(1), 1–17. Retrieved from http://todigra.org/index.php/todigra/article/view/6
Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2012). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England). doi:10.1177/09636625124586
Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge MA: MIT press.
Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. Retrieved from http://amj.aom.org/content/33/4/692.short
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: MacMillan. Retrieved from http://books.google.dk/books?id=ZuKTvERuPG8C
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). The token economy: a decade later. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 431–445. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-431
Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee Engagement : A Literature Review. Kingston.
Lieberoth, A., & Møller, M. (n.d.). Deep and shallow gamification: the thin evidence for effects in marketing and forgotten powers of good games (working title). In J. Martí-Parreño, C. Ruiz-Mafé, & L. L. Scribner (Eds.), Engaging Consumers through Branded Entertainment and Convergent Media. IGI global.
Lieberoth, A., & Roepstorff, A. (2014). Mixed methods in games research – playing on strengths and countering weaknesses. In P. Lankoski & S. Björk (Eds.), [untitled game studies methods book] - in prep. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction*. Cognitive Science, 4. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2/abstract
Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1987). Making Learning Fun - A Taxonomy Of Intrinsic Motivations For Learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analyses (Vol. 3, pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Making+Learning+Fun+-+A+Taxonomy+Of+Intrinsic+Motivations+For+Learning#0
Marczewski, A. (2012). Gamification – a simple introduction. Tips, advice and thoughts on gamification. Amazon.com: Self-published for Kindle.
Norman, D. A. (2002). The Design of Everyday Things (2002nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Prestopnik, N., & Crowston, K. (2011). Gaming for (citizen) science: exploring motivation and data quality in the context of crowdsourced science through the design and evaluation of a social-computational. E-Science Workshops ( …, 28–33. doi:10.1109/eScienceW.2011.14
Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., & Vandenberg, J. (2010). Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists M. Jordan Raddick. Astronomy Education Review, (9), 1–41.
Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Glued to games - How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound. Praeger.
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Leonardo (Vol. 37, p. 670). doi:10.1093/intimm/dxs150
Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2008). The Conscious, the Unconscious, and Familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1264–1288. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ809719
Sherry, J., & Lucas, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. Playing Video Games …. Retrieved from http://icagames.comm.msu.edu/vgu%26g.pdf
Skinner, B. F. (1973). The free and happy student. Phi Delta Kappan, 55(1), 13–16.
Skinner, N. C., Seddon, K., & Postlethwaite, K. C. (2008). Creating a model to examine motivation for sustained engagement in online communities. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-007-9048-2
Software Entertainment Association (ESA). (2013). 2013 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry.
Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-Game , In-Room , In-World : Reconnecting Video Game Play to the Rest of Kids ’ Lives. In The ecology of games (pp. 41–66). doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262693646.041
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London: Penguin Group US. Retrieved from http://books.google.dk/books?id=bt6sPxiYdfkC
Websites
ScienceatHome, Home. (n.d.).ScienceatHome, Home. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.scienceathome.org
Quantum Moves, Home. (n.d.).ScienceatHome, Home. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.scienceathome.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
